Message-ID: <13171487.1075862240929.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: pat.shortridge@enron.com, meredith.philipp@enron.com, pr <.palmer@enron.com>, linda.robertson@enron.com, john.shelk@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, l..nicolay@enron.com Subject: RE: RTO week follow up Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Shortridge, Pat , Philipp, Meredith , Palmer, Mark A. (PR) , Robertson, Linda , Shelk, John , Shapiro, Richard , Novosel, Sarah , Nicolay, Christi L. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \RSHAPIRO (Non-Privileged)\Shapiro, Richard\Deleted Items X-Origin: Shapiro-R X-FileName: RSHAPIRO (Non-Privileged).pst Great idea. My key points would be that (a) FERC needs to push ahead with its "right sized" RTOs and (b) focus on standardizing the tariff and market design [no more collaborative efforts]. Two simple, easy to understand thoughts. Also, I think that it's a mistake to use the term "large RTOs". We don't want large RTOs. We want RTOs that cover natural markets and benefit consumers. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Shortridge, Pat Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:05 AM To: Philipp, Meredith; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Robertson, Linda; Shelk, John; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah Subject: RTO week follow up In the aftermath of RTO week and following up on Rick's successful pre-briefings, we should be out spinning on the back end as well. Perhaps Sarah, Meredith and I can come up with some thoughts on message points and send them around for comment. Sound OK?