Message-ID: <2042571.1075858704139.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:27:23 -0700 (PDT) From: john.shelk@enron.com To: richard.shapiro@enron.com Subject: FW: DOE on Reliability Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Shelk, John X-To: Shapiro, Richard X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \RSHAPIRO (Non-Privileged)\Shapiro, Richard\NERC X-Origin: Shapiro-R X-FileName: RSHAPIRO (Non-Privileged).pst -----Original Message----- From: Novosel, Sarah Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:37 PM To: Shelk, John; Steffes, James D.; Yeung, Charles; Robertson, Linda Cc: 'dsalvosa@epsa.org'; 'aspring@epsa.org' Subject: RE: DOE on Reliability Thanks John. You need to forward this message to Jim and Rick also -----Original Message----- From: Shelk, John Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:58 PM To: Steffes, James D.; Yeung, Charles; Novosel, Sarah; Robertson, Linda Cc: 'dsalvosa@epsa.org'; 'aspring@epsa.org' Subject: DOE on Reliability According to Platt's Electric Power Daily (Fri. Aug. 24), the Administration is "leaning toward" putting the reliability function with FERC and the RTOs, NOT the NERC approach we oppose. We will check on this independently. We have certainly encouraged them in the direction they are now leaning toward.