Message-ID: <2683528.1075862219936.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:04:54 -0800 (PST) From: ken.e.randolph@dynegy.com To: richard.shapiro@enron.com Subject: RE: Notre Dame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Ken.E.Randolph@dynegy.com X-To: Shapiro, Richard X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \RSHAPIRO (Non-Privileged)\Shapiro, Richard\Notre Dame X-Origin: Shapiro-R X-FileName: RSHAPIRO (Non-Privileged).pst Congratulations to you also -- its going to be a great combination!!! I would suggest getting together Tuesday morning at 8:30 am over here if that works for you. If you have org charts, comp information and budget info that would facilitate the discussion. We can get with Peter Esposito after you and I meet. I also need to review the Legislative shop (we are very thin there) - if that function does not report to you I can get with Steve Kean on that. Have a great weekend! Ken . "Shapiro, Richard" To: enron.com> Subject: RE: Notre Dame 11/09/01 05:12 PM Congrats! You all minded the store..we didn't. My sincere hope is that as many people as possible in each company benefit from this acquisition. Please let me know when you and/or Peter want to sit down or if you'd like me to contact Peter directly. Thanks and congrats again.(I can be reached at 713-853-3407(w), 936-321-7153(h),281-831-3749(c)). -----Original Message----- From: Ken.E.Randolph@dynegy.com [mailto:Ken.E.Randolph@dynegy.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:13 AM To: Shapiro, Richard Subject: Re: Notre Dame Great. I'll look forward to visiting with you as soon as Notre Dame is signed. The organizations should be a great fit as it relates to regulatory and legislative affairs. Best regards. Ken "Shapiro, Richard" To: Subject: Notre Dame 11/06/01 07:42 AM If Notre Dame is brought to closure( my hope is that it will), once that occurs, I'd like to figure out with you, or whomever you deem appropriate from Dynegy a couple of things: 1) We currently have 65 government affairs professionals at Enron around the globe( 55 in North America, including the Washington office)..I anticipate making significant job cuts early in the transition and would like to make sure that the cuts are being done with the merged company fully in mind; 2) As you have seen from our disclosures, we have many more regulatory approvals associated with the Enron Assets as compared to Dynegy's- I'd like to work with you or whomever you designate to determine the most efficient way to process these filings through to approval. My intent with this e-mail is not to further burden the next couple of critical days, but merely to raise the issues so we're in a position to talk and meet soon thereafter. I think you will find in the government affairs professionals here the same commitment to excellence and integrity which characterizes the folks I've come into contact with at Dynegy. I'll wait to hear from you. Good luck in the next few days. ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************