Message-ID: <10499116.1075857476870.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 14:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: hunter.shively@enron.com
To: george.smith@enron.com
Subject: ENA Late Nominations
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Hunter S Shively
X-To: George Smith
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Hunter_Shively_Jun2001\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Shively-H
X-FileName: hshivel.nsf

George,

what is our view on this?

Hunter
---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 
09:46 PM ---------------------------


Barbara G Dillard@ENRON
06/02/2000 05:36 PM
To: Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dave Wear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hunter S 
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: ENA Late Nominations

Jason:

I was confronted this morning by Mark DiValero and he expressed his concern 
over ENA's nominations over the last two weeks.  He said that PGL is not 
staffed to confirm all 4 cycles of the nomination process and that ENA will 
start to get cut after the 2nd cycle if nominations are not correct.

I told Mark that I would get back with him early next week and let him know 
why ENA has had to consistently make changes at every nomination cycle.  
Also, please inform your schedulers of the risk that they are taking if 
nominations are not correct after the 2nd cycle (especially on weekends!).  

Please talk to your schedulers and let me know why we can't get our 
nominations correct.  Thanks!!

Barbara
(312)541-1232