Message-ID: <23765581.1075845312602.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.tomaski@enron.com
To: s..shively@enron.com
Subject: PGL & NS FP Summary
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Tomaski, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RTOMASK>
X-To: Shively, Hunter S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Hshivel>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Shively, Hunter S.\Shively, Hunter S.\Inbox
X-Origin: SHIVELY-H
X-FileName: Shively, Hunter S..pst


Here is the summary you requested.  They appear to be about a third of the way thru the program (target approx. 100 BCF).  Tony told me that they hedged some fix price with Sempra yesterday, but I don't know the whole story.  They are continuing to pursue this idea of "Producer lock-ins" which, if executed, would reduce ENA's exposure with PGL.  Let me know what you think.

Richard