Subject: Crescendo April Nom Change
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:37:00 -0700 (PDT)

Nom will be changed to 3,100 MMBtu/d, effective April 25th.

per disc with hillary, 4/23 pm.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Quick, Joan  
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Mack, Hillary; Brewer, Stacey; South, Steven
Subject: Crescendo April Nom Change

Hillary - please call me re this.  i have left you a voicemail.

joan 
x33152

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Jim" <[email-masked]>@ENRON 
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jim+22+20+3Cjjosborne+40apex2000+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.
com] 
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:34 AM
To: Quick, Joan
Subject: RE: April Noms

Based on no penalties, please lower our April nom to 2.84 MMCFD.
Thanks

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Quick, Joan [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:01 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: RE: April Noms

you shouldn't have any penalties from enron...none that i can think of.
all the excess is sold Gas Daily, so you shouldn't be penalized
anything.

joan

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  "Jim" <[email-masked]>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jim+22+20+3Cjjosborne+40apex2000+2Enet+3E+40ENRO
> [email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:35 AM
> To: Quick, Joan
> Subject: RE: April Noms
>
> Joan
>
> We need to make sure that if we lower our nom, we won't have a penalty
> from Enron.
>
> Please respond.
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quick, Joan [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 11:19 AM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: April Noms
>
>
>  Ken,
>
>  what do you suggest we lower the nom to?
>
>  joan
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:  "Ken" <[email-masked]>@ENRON
> >
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ken+22+20+3Ckckrisa+40apex2000+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@
> > ENRON.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:31 AM
> > To: Quick, Joan
> > Subject: FW: April Noms
> >
> > Joan,
> > One Compressor at the San Arroyo station was down for several days,
> > causing
> > high line pressures - it takes a while to work this pressure down.
> >
> > Let's discuss the lowering nomination option - give me a call when
> you
> > get a
> > chance.
> >
> > Ken Krisa
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim
> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:37 AM
> > To: Ken
> > Subject: FW: April Noms
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Quick, Joan [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:45 PM
> > To: [email-masked]
> > Cc: Otis, Brian
> > Subject: April Noms
> >
> > jim,
> >
> > i see that production is down a bit - around 2,954 mcf/d.  our April
> > first of the month nom is based on 3,123 mcf/d.  do you think we
> > should
> > lower our nom?
> >
> > thanks
> > joan
> >
> >
>
>  - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>

 - winmail.dat