Message-ID: <7592354.1075842094896.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: carol.clair@enron.com
To: leslie.hansen@enron.com
Subject: Re: ETA Amendment Letter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Carol St Clair
X-To: Leslie Hansen
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Carol_StClair_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: STCLAIR-C
X-FileName: cstclai.nsf

Leslie:

I think that you should based upon my experience with him.
Carol





	Leslie Hansen
	05/30/2000 02:40 PM
		
		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: ETA Amendment Letter

Dave has reviewed my proposed languages and signed off on the changes.    So, 
if he needs to see the final letter, he should be okay with my changes.  Do 
you think I need to discuss with him the specific question I raised below re 
1 ETA Amendment vs. 3 separate letters? 

I'll let you know when I've finalized with John.



	Carol St Clair
	05/30/2000 01:28 PM
		
		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: ETA Amendment Letter

Leslie:
I would run everything passed Dave Forester since we need his approval on the 
amendment letter for your piece anyway and see what he says.
Carol 



	Leslie Hansen
	05/30/2000 01:11 PM
		
		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: ETA Amendment Letter

Carol:

I've talked to John this morning and am working to finalize my agency 
language.  FYI, my preference is to set up GPU with 3 separate passwords -- 
GPU Service Inc. as agent for Met Ed, GPU Service Inc. as agent for Penn, and 
GPU Service Inc. as agent for NJ.  Pending resolution of Enpower bridging 
issues this afternoon, I intend to precede along this path since GPU is 
amenable.  Do you think we should have GPU execute 3 separate ETA Amendments 
in each capacity separately or do you think we should have them sign 3 
password applications and execute one ETA Amendment relating to all three 
capacities.

Leslie



	Carol St Clair
	05/30/2000 11:42 AM
		 
		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: ETA Amendment Letter

Leslie:
FYI.
Carol

----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 10:44 AM -----

	jroberts@gpu.com
	05/30/2000 10:20 AM
		 
		 To: "Carol St Clair" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: cchoate@gpu.com
		 Subject: Re: ETA Amendment Letter




Carol,

We agree that this is the agreed to changes, pending Leslie's change.  If you
see her in the hall, give her a "nudge."  I'd like to conclude this today.

Thanks,

John R.




"Carol St Clair" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> on 05/30/2000 10:25:39 AM



 To:      John H Roberts@GPU

 cc:      "Leslie Hansen" <Leslie.Hansen@enron.com>



 Subject: ETA Amendment Letter










John:
Per ypur voice mail this is the lateset version of the ETA amendment letter
without Leslie's chnages.  Please confirm that this part of it is opkay with 
you
and your counsel.  Thanks.


(See attached file: GPU Energy 2.doc)
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


 - GPU Energy 2.doc