Message-ID: <8079584.1075842110814.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 06:41:00 -0700 (PDT) From: carol.clair@enron.com To: russell.diamond@enron.com Subject: Re: American Central Energy- ISDA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Carol St Clair X-To: Russell Diamond X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Carol_StClair_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: STCLAIR-C X-FileName: cstclai.nsf Russell: I will draft something up later today for you to look at. With respect to Richardson Products, the July 29, 1999 Guaranty in the second paragraph already picks up all ECT affiliates which would include HPL, such that any physical contract between ECT or its affiliates and Richardson Products II, Ltd. would already be covered. Their letter mentions an April 28th Guaranty. Does one exist? Why I don't think that we need to say anything with respect to the July 29th Guaranty, it certainly wouldn't hurt for them to simply send us a letter referencing this Guaranty and stating that it is their understanding that the term "ECT Affiliates" as used in the Guaranty includes Houston Pipe Line Company. Carol