Message-ID: <12958075.1075852478432.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: lisa.yoho@enron.com
To: james.steffes@enron.com
Subject: FW: multilateral steel agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Lisa Yoho <Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON>
X-To: James D Steffes <James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\2001 Mid Year PRC
X-Origin: Steffes-J
X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst


----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 06/21/2001 04:30 PM -----


	Maria Arefieva/ENRON@enronXgate 06/04/2001 09:20 AM 	   To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: FW: multilateral steel agreement	




 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reed, Andrea V.  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:30 PM
To:	McMahon, Jeffrey
Cc:	Arefieva, Maria; Parsons, Douglas
Subject:	FW: multilateral steel agreement

Jeff, the following is an excellent summary of the '94 Aluminum agreement and the potential for a multilateral steel agreement.  Bottom line - the aluminum agreement failed in its execution (Russia cheated), while an agreement for steel would be virtually impossible to negotiate and enforce.

avr

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arefieva, Maria  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Reed, Andrea V.; Parsons, Douglas
Cc:	Yoho, Lisa; Long, Chris
Subject:	multilateral steel agreement

Andrea/Doug:

Attached please find a memo on the possiblity of a multilateral agreement in the steel sector that has been put together by our houston and dc offices.  It also provides an update on recent developments on 201.  

Thanks,


Masha