Message-ID: <29004485.1075852487101.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:37:36 -0700 (PDT) From: l..nicolay@enron.com To: john.shelk@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com Subject: RE: Southeast RTO: Southern's Load Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Nicolay, Christi L. X-To: Shelk, John , Novosel, Sarah , Steffes, James D. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Deleted Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst I am getting the info, but so far: Peak Loads SPP 34000 FL 31000 TVA 25000 PJM 54000 NY 31000 NEPOOL 25000 Entergy 24000 Southern 35000 We are getting the Midwest, VACAR, and Santee Cooper etc. (which would be added to Southern) -----Original Message----- From: Shelk, John Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:07 PM To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D. Subject: Southeast RTO: Southern's Load The Barton discussion draft says that FERC's hands would be tied and that they would have to approve a proposed RTO, as to size and scope, if the proposed RTO owns or has operational control over transmission facilities that serve at least 40,000 MW of load. Southern's CEO testified in Congress recently that their load is over 35,000. I assume the 40,000 MW minimum would permit the SeTrans proposal to meet the proposed statutory minimum since it is Southern plus a few munis, as I understand it. Is this correct? Who would know how many RTOs there would be if each were just over the 40,000 MW minimum? I assume it is much more than 4-5 RTOs -- if so, this is a good contrast to use in our Hill efforts. Thanks.