Subject: FW: CPUC Questions on DA Suspension
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:15:17 -0700 (PDT)

FYI. Please keep me posted as we hear from clients.

Jim, Sue and Jeff, please distribute any and all updates on this topic to: Angela, Michael, Lamar, David and Greg as they each own clients effected any actions. 

Thanks, Jeremy

 Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:35 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Frazier, Lamar; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike
Cc:	Leff, Dan; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David
Subject:	CPUC Questions on DA Suspension 

Jeremy --

To let you know where we stand on the CPUC's Investigation on DA Suspension.  

1.	Sue Mara is leading the effort to respond to the CPUC for Enron.

2.	We knew that the CPUC was at a minimum going to investigate how and/or whether to allow extensions of contracts and the application of other surcharge $$ to DA load given their earlier statements.  The issue on retroactivity is open primarily because they can ask these questions and (I believe) as leverage for other issues.

3.	We are coordinating with the big customers who recently left.  They are marshalling forces to oppose any retroactivity.  This is as much their fight as it is ours.

4.	At this time, Enron will file as a member of AReM.  We intend to oppose the CPUC's request for our contracts and transaction information.

If you want any other info or want to discuss further, let me know.

Jim