Message-ID: <10433476.1075852496645.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 06:36:00 -0800 (PST) From: steve.swain@enron.com To: d..steffes@enron.com Subject: RE: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy - MEETING TODAY AT 2pm Houston Time Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Swain, Steve X-To: Steffes, James D. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Deleted Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst I can make the call, let me know call in #. Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Steffes, James D. > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 6:12 AM > To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; > Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day > (E-mail); Swain, Steve > Cc: Noske, Linda J.; Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; > Sharp, Vicki > Subject: FW: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy - MEETING > TODAY AT 2pm Houston Time > > To discuss this outline and our issues list, can people > attend a 2pm Houston Time call. The meet and confer may be > on-going, but maybe either Jeff or Sue can jump off. > > Linda Noske will be sending out a call-in number. > > Thanks, > > Jim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steffes, James D. > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:04 AM > To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; > Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail) > Cc: Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki > Subject: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy > > Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on > how to proceed with SCE. > > 1. Form Enron Negotiation Team > > My recommendation is to use the same team we used with > PG&E + Jeff Dasovich. My understanding was that Lisa M. was > the lead negotiator - I would not change this. Jeff should > only be there to make introductions. > > 2. Meet & Confer (10/29) > > Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back > to everyone on what happens. > > 3. Reformed Stipulation > > I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to > this document. Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with > SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride. > > 4. Meeting > > My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE > can meet with us this Thursday. Can everyone make it that > needs to be there? Probably meet in California. We should > put the laundry list on the table. > > Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone > disagrees. > > Thanks, > > Jim