Message-ID: <353210.1075852498208.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:39:23 -0700 (PDT) From: c..williams@enron.com To: d..steffes@enron.com Subject: RE: SCE Stipulation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Williams, Robert C. X-To: Steffes, James D. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Deleted Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst 2 was the only time Jeanne had. i can fill you in afterwards. sue mara is going to participate. ok? -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:21 AM To: Williams, Robert C. Cc: Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff Subject: RE: SCE Stipulation How about 2:30 CST? Jim -----Original Message----- From: Williams, Robert C. Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:00 AM To: Steffes, James D. Cc: Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff Subject: RE: SCE Stipulation i think we've sent a markup to SCE. i am available today and agree it would be a good idea to meet. BTW are you available for a call today at 2 CST to discuss strategy for the mon meet and confer with SCE? -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:38 AM To: Williams, Robert C. Cc: Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff Subject: SCE Stipulation Bob -- Where do we stand on the SCE stipulation? I want to make sure that our push in SCE doesn't conflict or contradict something we are doing in the PG&E discussions. Can we meet today? Jim