Message-ID: <6680985.1075861639119.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:36:57 -0800 (PST) From: luiz.maurer@enron.com To: charles.yeung@enron.com, l..nicolay@enron.com Subject: RE: ERCOT Balanced Schedules Cc: d..steffes@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: d..steffes@enron.com X-From: Maurer, Luiz X-To: Yeung, Charles , Nicolay, Christi L. X-cc: Steffes, James D. X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Inbox X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst Charles I am OK with your simplifications. There was indeed repetition. There is still some redundancy at the very end (Are forward markets irrelevant?). But I think it does not hurt. I think the graph Mike included needs some further explanation. It is not self-explanatory. As per my conversation with Christi this morning, I will NOT contact Larry Ruff until I hear from you guys. I understand that you will be discussing this paper with Doug Gilbert today. Please let me know if I can be of any help. I am availablt today and tomorrow. Tks LM -----Original Message----- From: Yeung, Charles Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:15 AM To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Maurer, Luiz Cc: Walton, Steve; Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard Subject: ERCOT Balanced Schedules I have added an executive summary, removed a repetitive argument on historical need for balanced schedules and retitled the section headings. << File: BALANCED SCHEDULES 26November.doc >>