Message-ID: <9624347.1075861639337.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:16:54 -0800 (PST) From: alan.comnes@enron.com To: alan.comnes@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, ray.alvarez@enron.com, ray.alvarez@enron.com, christi.nicolay@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com Subject: RE: New Sect 206 Proceeding Comments Due December 5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Comnes, Alan X-To: Comnes, Alan , Novosel, Sarah , Alvarez, Ray , Alvarez, Ray , Nicolay, Christi , Steffes, James X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Inbox X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst I just talked to Erin Perrigo at EPSA and was told that EPSA will be requesting an extension of time (will file tomorrow Tues) for the comments currently due on 5 Dec. FYI -----Original Message----- From: Comnes, Alan Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Novosel, Sarah; Alvarez, Ray; Alvarez, Ray; Nicolay, Christi; Steffes, James Subject: New Sect 206 Proceeding Comments Due December 5 Importance: High Please read the attached order my summary and suggested comments for EPMI to the Section 206 case. (Thanks to Sara and Susan L. for info on these cases). I prepared it before I got Sam Behrend's "analysis.doc" << File: EL01-118-000_1.pdf >> << File: EPMI Comments in EL01-118-000.doc >> We should talk soon to formalize EPMI's position given the short notice for comments. Christi, per our call earlier today, can you set up a call? Should we involve Elizabeth Sager or other folks from the Legal Dept? I am available all day today (Monday). On Tuesday, I am available for an hour begginning at 9 a.m. CST. On wednesday, I am available from 9-10:30 CST and after 2 p.m. CST. For more background here is Sam B's analysis: << File: Analysis.DOC >>