Message-ID: <7408687.1075855180275.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:05:24 -0800 (PST)
From: richard.shapiro@enron.com
To: charles.ward@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com
Subject: RE: Merger Analysis - ERCOT Market Share
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Shapiro, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RSHAPIRO>
X-To: Ward, Charles </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cward3>, Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jsteffe>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jim_Steffes_Jan2002\Steffes, James D.\Notre Dame
X-Origin: Steffes-J
X-FileName: jsteffe (Non-Privileged).pst

Do we have any type of passive interest in the remaining 90%?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Charles 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Cc: Shapiro, Richard
Subject: Re: Merger Analysis - ERCOT Market Share
Importance: High


Do not include Ponderosa Pine (263 MW) in that.  We don't control those MW's.  We do own a LP interest in the facility which is only 10 percent.

Chuck