Message-ID: <19375586.1075855197073.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:53:34 -0800 (PST) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: kevin.keeney@enron.com Subject: FW: New CDWR Revenue Requirement Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Keeney, Kevin X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jim_Steffes_Jan2002\Steffes, James D.\Sent Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: jsteffe (Non-Privileged).pst Kevin -- Last update that I know about for CDWR costs. If Sue or Jeff know of later $ figures, please advise Kevin. Also, my understanding was that the CPUC simply disallowed the CDWR from having straight passthru without review. They may get to charge 100% of these dollars, but needs CPUC approval. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Tribolet, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 3:44 PM To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan Subject: New CDWR Revenue Requirement I have attached a comparison of the revised CDWR Revenue Requirement, along with a comparison with the July 22nd figures. * The total DWR dollars decrease $471.5 million over 2001 and 2002, centered in the periods 3Q 2001 and onward. The "past problem" actually increases by $1.9 billion (1Q & 2Q 2001). * PG&E has their share increased $730.1 million over 2002 and 2002, centered in 1Q and 2Q 2001. * Edison ends up with a significant decrease of $1.199 billion in 2001 and 2002. Regards, Michael