Message-ID: <9991459.1075855200310.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:54:07 -0800 (PST) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: luiz.maurer@enron.com, l..nicolay@enron.com, michael.roan@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com Subject: Balanced Schedules - Enron Position Paper Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Maurer, Luiz , Nicolay, Christi L. , Roan, Michael , Novosel, Sarah X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jim_Steffes_Jan2002\Steffes, James D.\Sent Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: jsteffe (Non-Privileged).pst Luiz - Please get internal comments from Thane Twiggs, Sue Mara, Steve Walton, Dan Staines, and Dave Perrino before letting Doug go public with this document. I want to make sure that we are correct in some of our analysis (for example, I think that you may have misinterpreted the FERC in the California discussion). Jim -----Original Message----- From: Maurer, Luiz Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 7:09 AM To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Roan, Michael Cc: Steffes, James D.; Gilbert-smith, Doug Subject: Balanced Schedules - Position Paper Christi, Mike: As per your request, please find enclosed my first draft of the Balanced Schedules White Paper - to be used by Doug in Ercot. If you think the graphs help illustrate the points, they should be inserted and cross-referenced as part of the chapter " can reliability be jeopardized if balanced schedules are abadoned"? (cross-reference is relative straightforward as graphs as described in the text) << File: BALANCED SCHEDULES.doc >> << File: Graphs.ppt >> LM