Subject: RE: Congestion Pass Through
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 06:19:43 -0700 (PDT)

Mike --

EPMI is the QSE.  As long as our customers don't mind that we are deciding their congestion charges internally, then this should work.  My concern was that our customers would balk at Enron deciding how much of our costs they should pay?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Sharp, Vicki; Keller, James
Subject:	Congestion Pass Through

Jim--when you get back I'd like to make sure this analysis fits your understanding of congestion in TX.  Thanks.  MDS
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 09/25/2001 10:18 AM ---------------------------
From:	Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/25/2001 10:17 AM
To:	Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Patricia Collins/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	 
Subject:	Congestion Pass Through

We should have no problem with the pass through of congestion in Texas.  The QSE receives a charge for our entire load and then allocates it to our load of a pro rata basis.  We then pass through these costs to the customer.  This is the same way we do things in the NE and the only way we can pass through intrazonal congestion.  If you would like to discuss this further, please give me a call at 33143. Thanks.

-Joe