Message-ID: <32923948.1075852505668.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 06:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: d..steffes@enron.com
To: sarah.novosel@enron.com, john.shelk@enron.com
Subject: RE: NERC comments on Barton 9-21 discussion draft
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEFFE>
X-To: Novosel, Sarah </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Snovose>, Shelk, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jshelk>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Sent Items
X-Origin: Steffes-J
X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst

John --
 
I'm heading up tomorrow.  Do we need a call today to make sure that my ducks are still in a row?  I don't have the Barton draft handy.
 
Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Novosel, Sarah 
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Shelk, John; Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: NERC comments on Barton 9-21 discussion draft


 

-----Original Message----- 
From: David Cook 
Sent: Wed 10/3/2001 8:38 AM 
To: rlc@nerc.com 
Cc: 
Subject: NERC comments on Barton 9-21 discussion draft



FYI, attached are comments that NERC sent yesterday to Chairman Barton
and Mr. Boucher on Barton's 9-21 discussion draft.

David Cook
NERC General Counsel
Office:  609-452-8060
Cell:  609-915-3063
david.cook@nerc.net

 <<Gent to Barton 100201with comments.pdf>>