Message-ID: <4446351.1075852509193.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:48:12 -0700 (PDT) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: lisa.mellencamp@enron.com Subject: FW: PG&E Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Mellencamp, Lisa X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Sent Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst I didn't get the attachment. If you want my thoughts, please let me know. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Williams, Robert C. Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:10 AM To: Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B. Cc: Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D. Subject: RE: PG&E I would ask Mike about the last sentence in bullet 5. Based on the language of the quote the Commission appears to be referring to the surcharge "adopted in D. 01-03-082." Was the .01 surcharge "adopted" in that proceeding? Maybe I am reading this too literally. I do agree that the rationale for exempting DA customers from the 3 cent surcharge applies equally to the 1 cent surcharge, and that we should continue to strive for this clarification at the CPUC (which Sue Mara is handling). Sue, I am forwarding this to you for your comments. -----Original Message----- From: Mellencamp, Lisa Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:49 AM To: Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Tribolet, Michael; Williams, Robert C.; Sanders, Richard B. Subject: FW: PG&E please let me know if any of you disagree/have comments -----Original Message----- From: Simmons, Linda J. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:49 PM To: Mellencamp, Lisa Subject: FW: PG&E -----Original Message----- From: MDay @ENRON Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PM To: Simmons, Linda J. Subject: RE: PG&E Here is our settlement sheet on the one cent surcharge, attached below. Mike Day - X28655.DOC [Mellencamp, Lisa] << File: X28655.DOC >>