Message-ID: <3347859.1075852514972.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: harry.kingerski@enron.com, janine.migden@enron.com Subject: RE: Anti-competitive Subgroup Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Kingerski, Harry , Migden, Janine X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Sent Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst Janine -- Where does this stand? I just read the text and agree with Harry. Most importantly, the HHI may not be suitable given the high degree of regulation of ComEd service. As important, I don't think the ICC cares too much about Enron losing market share. Not the best lead argument. Let's talk. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Kingerski, Harry Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:12 PM To: Migden, Janine; Steffes, James D. Subject: FW: Anti-competitive Subgroup Janine - this is getting insane. With all due respect to Marc, this has nothing to do with the issues at hand. -----Original Message----- From: Ulrich, Marc Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:17 AM To: Migden, Janine; rspilky@newenergy.com; poconnor@newenergy.com; jhextell@newenergy.com; dfabrizius@kaztex.com; Christopher.townsend@pipperrudnick.com Cc: Sharfman, Guy; Surface, Jerald; Kendall, Heath; Kingerski, Harry; Boston, Roy Subject: Anti-competitive Subgroup Here is a copy of my uncompleted 1st draft of my testimony. I will hopefully be finishing this week. << File: M-Ulrich Direct Testimony.doc >> Also here is a proposed agenda for today's conference call at 3pm << File: Agenda ComEd 2001 DST Rate Case 08-06-01.doc >> Call number and pass code are as follows. Monday, August 6, 2001 from 3 p.m. - 4 p.m. CST. 800-991-9019. Passcode 7314194#. Marc L. Ulrich 713-345-4784 (office) 877-720-7711 (pager)