Message-ID: <24062514.1075852519062.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: steve.montovano@enron.com Subject: RE: SE/Fla RTO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Montovano, Steve X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Sent Items X-Origin: Steffes-J X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst Right now I'd let the FERC make that call. If asked, Enron believes that incorporating Fla into the Southeast makes great sense for Florida consumers - more access to low cost markets, etc. Why is the fight ours? Let's keep it alive before FERC but not make it a big push for Enron. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Montovano, Steve Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:19 PM To: Steffes, James D. Subject: SE/Fla RTO Jim - What is your position regarding Fla in the SE RTO? Do we want to fight the fight with the Fla. PSC or are we willing to accept Fla as a stand alone at this point, and let things sort out in the rest of the SE first. I believe Staines thinks that we will lose ground in Fla rolling them up into the SE RTO? I probably agree with that statement and also believe we will rattle the Fla PSC's cage with little or no chance of winning the argument. Thoughts? SM