Message-ID: <20122300.1075852528315.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: sarah.novosel@enron.com
To: j..kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, 
	linda.robertson@enron.com, l..nicolay@enron.com, 
	john.shelk@enron.com
Subject: Summary of Sup. Ct. Argument
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Novosel, Sarah </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SNOVOSE>
X-To: Kean, Steven J. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Skean>, Shapiro, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rshapiro>, Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jsteffe>, Robertson, Linda </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lrobert3>, Nicolay, Christi L. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cnicola>, Shelk, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jshelk>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\US Sup Ct Case
X-Origin: Steffes-J
X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst

Attached is a brief recap of the Supreme Court case through oral argument.  I don't think it provides any confidential information, so we may want to share Lou's analysis with the entire Government Affairs group, the commercial group, and our PR people.
 
Sarah
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Cohen, Louis [mailto:LCohen@Wilmer.COM]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:50 AM
To: Novosel, Sarah
Cc: Hartsoe, Joe; Jeffrey D. (Dan) Watkiss (E-mail); Killory, Ted; Frankel, Jonathan; Palansky, IJay; Cohen, Louis
Subject: Document attached: 0096 Summary of Sup. Ct. Argument-10-3-01.doc


Sarah, here is the summary of the Supreme Court argument that I promised Wednesday.