Message-ID: <13027434.1075858501114.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:53:52 -0700 (PDT) From: chris.stokley@enron.com To: 'mertz@enron.com, jmertz@caiso.com Subject: RE: April 29 data Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Stokley, Chris X-To: 'Mertz, Jeanette' X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Stokley, Chris (Non-Privileged)\Chris Stokley\SENT X-Origin: Stokley-C X-FileName: Stokley, Chris (Non-Privileged).pst I will forward you message on to the person that should be of asstinance in getting this issue resoleved. I am currently in Housont working on a project, so I aplogize for having to punt Chris -----Original Message----- From: Mertz, Jeanette [mailto:JMertz@caiso.com] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 1:47 PM To: Stokley, Chris Cc: Almeida, Keoni; Madeiros, Glenna; Russell, Mike Subject: April 29 data Chris, I am hoping you can give me a little more information on the problems that occurred for Trade Day April 9, 2001. There is a post final dispute being processed, and I am a little confused on the problem EPMI had when processing and submitting this data. What I understand is that the data for all zones was submitted with null values, however, we have two versions in our system, the first was received on June 8, and the second version was received on August 9. For all of your demand zones, PGE1-4, SCE, and SDG1, there are no differences in the two versions of data submitted. Please look into this as soon as you can. It is important that we have accurate and correct data for your Post final dispute. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to give me a call. Thanks. Jeanette Mertz Data Quality Auditor California ISO 916-608-5971 jmertz@caiso.com