Message-ID: <8920243.1075840040807.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:34:18 -0700 (PDT) From: mike.swerzbin@enron.com To: stewart.rosman@enron.com Subject: RE: Valuation Overview Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Swerzbin, Mike X-To: Rosman, Stewart X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Swerzbin, Mike\Sent Items X-Origin: SWERZBIN-M X-FileName: The market last week for the flat MC was about $31: that difference would be 9.50 = $2,654,02 nominal for the increased mws. The loss of the delivery value is about $.75/MWh- (about $2.3 million nominal). The loss of the option is probably about $1 million. Overall, you did a very job I think its worth $1.5 million- if you go by the numbers its 0. -----Original Message----- From: Rosman, Stewart Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:43 AM To: Swerzbin, Mike Subject: Valuation Overview MWHRs = 4 Years and 1 quarter Flat so that equals approximately 37,250 Hours The difference between 102 (the new amount) and 94.5 (the old average flat amount) = 7.5 MW * 37,250 HRs = 279,375 MWhrs I was under the impression that a 100 MW flat amount would equal $3 million value (a $16 difference between market and $21.50). This would indicate the 102 equals a $4,100,000 valuation. As to the discount in value due to the flexibility and delivery point I am looking to you for leadership. If my assumptions are wrong then let me know. Stewart