Message-ID: <3676828.1075840041749.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: mike.swerzbin@enron.com
To: glenn.surowiec@enron.com
Subject: RE: Stream Flow Deal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Swerzbin, Mike </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MSWERZB>
X-To: Surowiec, Glenn </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Gsurowie>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Swerzbin, Mike\Sent Items
X-Origin: SWERZBIN-M
X-FileName: 

Glenn-

I really have no interest in Lewis River or Klamath since there is zero correlation to the Columbia flows....  However, I'll offer the whole deal at $3 million per year with the hair if they're insistent.  Or we'll do any power options the weather desk wants.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Surowiec, Glenn  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:56 AM
To:	Wolfe, Greg; Oh, Jeffrey; Swerzbin, Mike; Heizenrader, Tim
Subject:	FW: Stream Flow Deal

Where do we stand on this? I sent Sanjeev some Asian Option Pricing last week; I get the sense he wants to pursue the original stream flow structure (one which were not comfortable with). Let me know what our commercial position is. Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Khanna, Sanjeev  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:50 AM
To:	Surowiec, Glenn
Subject:	Stream Flow Deal


Glenn:

How is the pricing for the stream flow going?

Please let me know,

Sanjeev