Message-ID: <13082332.1075841913635.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: evelyn.metoyer@enron.com
Subject: Re: deal 580011
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kate Symes
X-To: Evelyn Metoyer
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

Thanks for checking on that, Rhonda - I'll make a mental note of it.

Kate




Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/12/2001 01:34 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: deal 580011  

According to Rhonda we never use BP Amoco however, she thinks the Calgary 
office does.

Thanks


   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/12/2001 03:13 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: deal 580011  

I've changed this to BP Energy - and I was wondering - didn't BP Amoco change 
over to BP Energy? Do we ever trade with the old counterparty name anymore?

Kate



Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/12/2001 12:29 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: deal 580011

 
Cara Semperger
deal 580011
CP name should be BP Energy not BP Amoco.

Thanks