Message-ID: <23795894.1075841915616.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 04:34:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kate.symes@enron.com To: fran.chang@enron.com, heather.dunton@enron.com, samantha.law@enron.com Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kate Symes X-To: Fran Chang, Heather Dunton, Samantha Law X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: SYMES-K X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf Here is the information I received back from IT in Houston regarding the Forward Obligation Report. It looks like, for our purposes, the most accurate way to run the report is showing only term deals. The "Schedule" and "Liquidate" versions of the report do not capture desk-to-desk deals, and therefore will not show our traders' positions in relation to each other, which I believe is what we're looking for. Am I right? Or totally crazy? Let me know what you think. Thanks, Kate ---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/04/2001 11:33 AM --------------------------- From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 01:34 PM CDT To: Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report Hi Diana & Kate, You are not wasting our time, you make our time valuable. You should be able to see ver 3.0.0.36 in production and ver 3.0.0.38 in stage, if not phone David Poston for support. Ver 3.0.0.38 is newer and includes insignifficant changes on the form for selection desks, which Corry Bentley requested here. They don't allow us to promote now things like that to production the last five days and the first day of the month. Now the report is able to show both the term and schedule (liquidation) data. The term data are the way the deal was entered with Deal Entry, Deal Blotter or EOL bridge, signed and confirmed. The schedule data should be very much the same with all the changes in Deal Scheduling. There is no difference between schedule and liquidation data, schedule data is a subset of liquidation one in time and it is about 2-3 weeks. At the moment the schedule strips for WEST contain data from 3/22/2001 to 4/5/2001, and the liquidation the same data from 4/2/1996. Because we don't schedule normally desk-to-desk deals (I think we schedule between EAST and WEST only) we don't have schedule (liquidation) data for desk-to-desk. I hided the check box to avoid confusions. The option Show Desk is very simple, changes the format of the header for Region, nothing else. Kroum -----Original Message----- From: Scholtes, Diana Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:34 PM To: Kroumov, Kroum Subject: Forward Obligation Report Kroum, I was running the new version of the Obligation Report. I was not included in the testing phase of the new version and apparently the report is still not doing what the "fix" was initiated for. Originally, my discussions with Doung Luu was for the Obligation report to capture: 1. All deals with any changes made in Deal Scheduling and 2. All Desk to Desk deals. Number (2), I believe was the difficult one. When selecting the option on "Show Deals" in order to capture schedule changes you must select "Liquidate". This does work, but it does not give you the option to select "Show Desk to Desk", which like I said before, was the intent of the changes. Please contact me for further discussion. I apologize for not participating and wasting your time. Sincerely, Diana Scholtes (503) 464-3807 -----Original Message----- From: Symes, Kate Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:06 PM To: Pate, Brett; Kroumov, Kroum Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON Subject: Forward Obligation Report Question Good afternoon, IT Wizards - I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report. It is now possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals. In the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my desk-to-desk deals from those numbers. Now I believe the report is designed to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report. Each produce completely different numbers! Please let me know when you get a chance. Thanks, Kate Symes Trading Support 503-464-7486