Message-ID: <23323399.1075841910895.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: evelyn.metoyer@enron.com
Subject: Re: MISSING DEALS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kate Symes
X-To: Evelyn Metoyer
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

595511 - buy Idaho, May, Mid-C, 330

And on the Bloomberg confirms re: Mid-C - I'm pulling up the contract through 
Livelink, because Sean wants to make sure the language does not allow for 
curtailment at Mid-C if another unit in the path goes down. He says our Mid-C 
is unrestricted anyway, so we shouldn't need another name in Enpower. Is this 
the first time you've seen this delivery point name in a confirmation? Hold 
off on this confirm for just a minute while I go over this with Sean.

Thanks,
Kate




Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/27/2001 01:45 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: MISSING DEALS



Bloomberg
Mike Swerzbin

I am missing
Buy from Idaho May Mid-C  peak 25mw at $330.00




Also, Bloomberg sent over some confirmations for deal 595472 and 595473 and 
the location is for unrestricted Mid-C.  Should we have this deal in enpower 
as unrestricted Mid-C because if so it's not a selection currently.   Just 
wondering!!