Message-ID: <17799934.1075841926534.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:51:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: kimberly.hundl@enron.com
Subject: Re: Public Service Company of N.Mexico #522906
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kate Symes
X-To: Kimberly Hundl
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

Looks like a real time guy put this deal in - along with three others - for 
El Paso. Real Time isn't used to marking confirms on their deals, since 
they're usually just trading hour-ahead. Let me know how you'd like these to 
be changed (i.e. "yes-agreement" or "yes-counterparty to send confirm"), and 
I'll do that right away.

Thanks,
Kate




Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
02/15/2001 07:24 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Public Service Company of N.Mexico #522906

This deal looks to me like it needs to be confirmed, but it was marked no 
confirm.  Do you know of a reason why it shouldn't be confirmed?  If not, I 
need a contact name so that i can send out a letter on it.
Thanks!
Kim