Message-ID: <3926185.1075841798180.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 00:46:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kimberly.hundl@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Subject: Re: City of Shasta Lake Deal #509089
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kimberly Hundl
X-To: Kate Symes
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

sorry about that, i noticed that someone changed it yesterday, and i didn't 
let you know.  so, have a good day anyway!
Kim


   Kate Symes @ ECT                01/31/2001 08:18 PM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: City of Shasta Lake Deal #509089  

I'm not sure if someone else got to this before I did, but I see the same end 
date at the top and bottom of this deal - 6/30/01. Let me know if this needs 
to be changed, or if it's not showing up correctly for you. 

Thanks,
Kate



Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
01/31/2001 07:33 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: City of Shasta Lake Deal #509089

Hi Kate,
Please have a look at the term on this deal.  There is a discrepancy between 
the end date at the top of the screen in Deal Entry and the one listed in the 
strips at the bottom.  Is the correct end date 6/30 or 6/1? 
Thanks!
Kim