Message-ID: <9997146.1075841889333.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:49:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: kerri.thompson@enron.com
Subject: Re: apb checkout
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kate Symes
X-To: Kerri Thompson
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

I checked in Jeff's trade log - he just stepped into a meeting - and 504970 
had been crossed out to show 50 MW. But 505118 only has 25 MW. Does this 
sound correct? I'm a little confused about what you're asking - should the 
deals match at 50 MW on peak? Or is one 25 and one 50?

Kate




Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/25/2001 02:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: apb checkout  

the williams deals with apb at 215.00, should total 150 mw.  we are just 
missing 25 mw.




   Kate Symes @ ECT                01/25/2001 04:40 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: apb checkout  

505118 has been changed to 1/26 -1/27. Still checking on missing deal.



Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/25/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: apb checkout

505118
term should be 26-27

missing deal just like deal 505118

505223 price should be 300.00

misssing 2 deals for bob, will get details.

thanks