Message-ID: <13346867.1075841897620.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 03:34:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: sharen.cason@enron.com
Subject: Re: NCPA deal #541645
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kate Symes
X-To: Sharen Cason
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

okay - cool.


   
	
	
	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/09/2001 11:40 AM
	

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: NCPA deal #541645  

Thanks!  Stewart had already called me this morning about this deal and had 
someone in risk change the other two legs.  


   Kate Symes                03/09/2001 01:29 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: NCPA deal #541645  

It looks like only leg 4 had firm energy - I changed that to CAISO. Legs 2 
and 3 already had CAISO energy, and leg 1 is killed. Is that okay?

Kate


   
	
	
	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/09/2001 07:01 AM
	

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: NCPA deal #541645

These two legs are entered with NP-15 delivery points with firm energy.  Let 
me know if this is correct.

Thanks!