Message-ID: <16418282.1075841899024.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:53:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: rhonda.denton@enron.com
Subject: Re: Enmax
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kate Symes
X-To: Rhonda L Denton
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

Sorry Rhonda - I forgot to also send this message on to you!

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/15/2001 08:57 AM 
---------------------------
   Kate Symes                03/15/2001 08:52 AM

To: Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: Enmax  

These deals have been changed to reflect the correct counterparty name, and 
I've forwarded the message to the real time traders who did the deals and 
their manager. Thanks for the heads up!

Kate


To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Re: Enmax  

Rhonda,

You are correct!



Rhonda L Denton@ECT
03/14/2001 03:40 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Enmax

540039, 541695, 541715, and 541737 are booked to Enmax Corporation.  I think 
they should be booked to Enmax Energy Corporation.  Wendy Conwell in credit 
has prepared a credit work sheet on this CP so I believe this is the correct 
entity.  Can you check?