Message-ID: <30078388.1075860216384.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 04:11:00 -0800 (PST) From: janice.moore@enron.com To: mark.taylor@enron.com Subject: Re: EOL Confirmations Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Janice R Moore X-To: Mark Taylor X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Archive\11_99 X-Origin: Taylor-M X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf Mark: What do you know about the apparent decision to attach GTCs when faxing out the confirms? I believe it was the gas/power people who made that statement at our October mtg (you were out of town, as I recall). ---------------------- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 17.11.99 12:08 --------------------------- Alan Aronowitz 17.11.99 10:06 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: EOL Confirmations I have not had any discussions with Mark Taylor on the point of attaching GTCs. I don't know why it has been determined to be appropriate to do the attachment. Please consult with Mark on this and let me know what you find out. Thanks. Alan From: Janice R Moore 11/11/99 10:40 PM To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EOL Confirmations You will recall that we went to a meeting last month w/ the EOL people while you were out of town. That meeting revealed that a lot of work still needed to be done on the confirms. Of course, there still hasn't been time to finish the liquids products EOL confirm templates, and I think the priority got less urgent, since these products will be among the last to be traded by EOL. But the quesiton lingers about the need to attach GTCs to each confirm that's sent out to the EOL counterparty. It seemed to us that perhaps you and Mark Taylor and others might have had discussions on that topic ahnd reached some conclusion. Rob Cass made a rather cogent appeal that we not require the attachment (lots of manhours, for one reason, since the computer will not automatically generate the GTCs or autofax them). But we never had a chance to talk about this, so I'm wondering if you could give me your thoughts. Thanks. By the way, it looks like the SK deal closing is on for next week, so I'll be leaving for Singapore on Monday. ---------------------- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 11/11/99 10:17 PM --------------------------- Lynn E Shivers 11/09/99 06:33 PM To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EOL Confirmations Have you had a chance to review and finalize the templates for any of our EOL confirmations? Also, have any decisions been made on "GTC" attachment/no attachment? Thanks for your help! Lynn