Message-ID: <3171998.1075858614207.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 15:29:18 -0700 (PDT) From: kathryn.cordes@enron.com To: legal <.taylor@enron.com>, mark.greenberg@enron.com Subject: FW: ConfirmLogic Target Customer List-Legal Entity Name Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Cordes, Kathryn X-To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) , Greenberg, Mark X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Mark E (Legal)\Inbox X-Origin: Taylor-M X-FileName: MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged).pst Mark: Per Tom Gros, Greg Piper is seeing a status on Monday's which tracks various activities one being the progress of legal amendments to customers. Attached is this week's status report. I've asked that you be included in the distribution since your team's effort is being reported. Kathryn -----Original Message----- From: Cordes, Kathryn Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:52 PM To: Theriot, Kim S.; Shackleton, Sara Cc: Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Greenberg, Mark; Hansen, Leslie; Smith, Jennifer Marie Subject: RE: ConfirmLogic Target Customer List-Legal Entity Name Sara: I have followed up with Brent and he is working on the Entergy-Koch amendment for CommodityLogic. He cannot commit to a completion date at this time since he has some other priorities. I've asked for Friday and he has indicated that may be aggressive. The sales team is presenting Entergy-Koch the CommodityLogic legal agreements today (ESA, Password application, Subscription Agreement). In light of this, can you provide a status of where the other 18 customer amendments are (excluding Sempra and Entergy-Koch) ? The Sales process is moving along and we will need to have these amendments ready to present to the customer soon. Could you go through the list and provide an estimate date of when a draft of the amendment would be available by client. We need to provide a status to management on Monday 10/8. Per our conversation today, if there is a way to focus on the creation of a template that addresses the confirmation exchange via electronic systems (e.g. ConfirmLogic) that can be shared earlier with the clients. The additional language that is deemed necessary can be added to this form as needed per counterparty. This will allow us to achieve getting something to the client so they can start the process from their side while we continue to shore up what language needs to be added. We still need to be thinking of how to keep this process simple to allow quick turnaround yet satisfy the legal requirements for confirmations. I ask that you and Leslie continue to help define a better process for us and I will continue to work with Kim and the sales team to implement this process. Thanks for your help Kathryn -----Original Message----- From: Theriot, Kim S. Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:30 PM To: Shackleton, Sara Cc: Cordes, Kathryn; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Greenberg, Mark; Hansen, Leslie Subject: ConfirmLogic Target Customer List-Legal Entity Name Importance: High Sara, See attached spreadsheet which shows the legal entity names by counterparty for each commodity. Name differences between the commodities are highlighted in Blue. Kim Theriot << File: Top20 Legal Entity Names.xls >> -----Original Message----- From: Shackleton, Sara Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:56 AM To: Theriot, Kim S. Cc: Greenberg, Mark; Cordes, Kathryn; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Hansen, Leslie Subject: ConfirmLogic Target Customer List Kim: I am reviewing the list of 20 target customers dated 9/14/01 in an effort to set up a document drafting timetable. For financial trading purposes, I need an accurate list of trading counterparties reflecting the complete name of each legal entity. Also, if a company is split into more than one legal entity (such as power and gas) for financial trading purposes, I need the names of both entities. Thanks. Sara Shackleton Enron Wholesale Services 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a Houston, TX 77002 Ph: (713) 853-5620 Fax: (713) 646-3490