Message-ID: <24846169.1075858614673.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: h..moore@enron.com
To: e..dickson@enron.com, legal <.taylor@enron.com>
Subject: ONEOK EOL Amendment
Cc: s..theriot@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: s..theriot@enron.com
X-From: Moore, Janet H. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JHMOORE>
X-To: Dickson, Stacy E. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sdickso>, Taylor, Mark E (Legal) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mtaylo1>
X-cc: Theriot, Kim S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ktherio>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Mark E (Legal)\Inbox
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged).pst

Mark:  I'm not sure whether this CP does financial trading.  Regardless, I've included the highlighted language that I had circulated with  the Idacorp draft; I think that you were mulling over whether that new language was acceptable.  Please let us know your thoughts so that we can finalize the new rider.  THANKS!

Stacy: Would you like to tackle ONEOK next?  Also, please let me know your thoughts on the bold faced language.

Janet