Message-ID: <28952443.1075862095068.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:49:01 -0700 (PDT) From: jparks@tnrcc.state.tx.us To: e.taylor@enron.com Subject: RE: TNRCC State Summary File Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jim Parks X-To: Taylor, Michael E X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MTAYLOR5 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Michael E\Inbox\TNRCC X-Origin: Taylor-M X-FileName: MTAYLOR5 (Non-Privileged).pst Mr. Taylor: No, lets just call it a good set of questions and end it at that. JParks >>> "Taylor, Michael E" 09/26/01 01:25PM >>> Jim, Was I billed anything for this latest request? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Jim Parks [mailto:JPARKS@tnrcc.state.tx.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:08 PM To: Taylor, Michael E Subject: RE: TNRCC State Summary File Mr. Taylor: I attach the most current query from the September State Summary File. It would be ideal if you could obtain data from the October State Summary File because then all of the data sent to you regarding your latest data request would be from October. BTW, the naming convention with this data is "enronxxxx.xls" where the x'x are the month (10 or 09) and the FY ('97, '98 '99 '00). This file is also in Excel v. 5 format. Let me know if this data fits the bill. Same billing information as with the previous data. Jim Parks PH 512 239-2544 FAX 512 239-0888 jparks@tnrcc.state.tx.us >>> "Taylor, Michael E" 09/26/01 10:27AM >>> Jim, Thanks for the great information. Also, is any information available for 2000 for any of the same account numbers? Sincerely, Michael Taylor 713-853-1885 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Parks [mailto:JPARKS@tnrcc.state.tx.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:11 AM To: Taylor, Michael E Subject: RE: TNRCC State Summary File Mr. Taylor: Here are the emissions data files from the appropriate State Summary Files for the years 1997, 1998, 1999. The attached files are in Excel v. 5 format. If Excel v. 5 format is not acceptable I will be able to send them to you in ASCII.TXT, comma-delimited, first row of data used as field names format. Let me know if you want them in the latter described format. This data is just for the TNRCC account numbers supplied in your request. Please let me know if this data is acceptable. There is no charge for this data because it is not the entire State Summary File for each year. I want to thank you for typing the account numbers. This saves me considerable typing time when setting up the queries. If you have any questions or need additional data, you may contact me at the locations listed below. Thank you for the opportunity to serve your data request. Jim Parks PH 512 239-2544 FAX 512 239-0888 jparks@tnrcc.state.tx.us >>> "Taylor, Michael E" 09/25/01 01:37PM >>> Jim, I wanted to know how I would find this data. I am looking for the NOx emissions for the accounts below for 1997-2000. I have some of the data for 1999, and very little for 2000. How do I find the rest of the data? Website? Database? I believe you sent me the state database in August which included some 1999 and 2000 numbers for the accounts below. I suppose some more accounts may have been updated for 2000. ACCOUNT # HG1495V HG0071Q GB0004L GB0153Q HG1174V HG0713S MQ0009F HG0232Q HG0234M HG0228H MQ0007J HG0033B HG0048L FG0020V GB0037T CI0012D HG0659W BL0082R BL0022M Sincerely, Michael Taylor Enron Global Markets (713) 853-1885 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Parks [mailto:JPARKS@tnrcc.state.tx.us] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:48 PM To: Taylor, Michael E Subject: RE: TNRCC State Summary File Mr. Taylor: 1) The allowable data is generally unique to each permit. Because of this a general statement like "the allowable tons/year for SO2 in Harris County is ......." would not be defendable or valid. 2) I believe that the allowable data varies in relation to the season of year and part of the state - a.k.a., "ambient background threshold". In other words, if it is ozone season, allowable emissions probably would be lower. 3) The allowable emissions threshold is also variable over time. 25 years ago, Harris county probably did not need an allowable cap for certain emissions. As industry grows the allowable emissions will be adjusted. The period of time for the data to become outdated could be as little as 1 month, depending on when new allowables or new permits are initiated. 4) Texas charges corporations a "tax" for emissions over their allowable limit. It is sort of a pay-as-you-go plan. Of course I am being very simplistic here, but the point is still the same. Your questions are excellent and I am giving you as specific an answer as possible. I hope I am not being too pointed but to the data oriented person, the previous points are important for data integrity. Jim Parks >>> "Taylor, Michael E" 08/23/01 03:10PM >>> Jim, Could you please explain to me where these numbers would NOT be accurate? I was warned that the data (allowables) would not be 100% accurate because of certain reasons. Can you please detail those reasons for me? Michael Taylor Coal and Emissions Trading Enron Global Markets (713) 853-1885 ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************