Message-ID: <18242951.1075862106012.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:12:09 -0800 (PST) From: trevor.woods@enron.com To: oppenheimer.'david@enron.com Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Woods, Trevor X-To: 'David Oppenheimer @ENRON' @ENRON>, Taylor, Michael E X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MTAYLOR5 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Michael E\Inbox\Trevor X-Origin: Taylor-M X-FileName: MTAYLOR5 (Non-Privileged).pst mike t will get it out. sox is almost done and the nox we've been speaking of is close as well. we've got more time to sell the voc than the others. -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:07 PM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA sox is almost final on you selling away? which Nox? and what's the time on the VOC? certificates would help. fax 212.232.5353. -----Original Message----- From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:09 PM To: doppenheimer@natsource.com; Michael.E.Taylor@enron.com Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA got me on it's uses. want me to fax you the certs? the sox is almost final on the sale and the nox is close. i think there is a little more time for the voc. tell mike t your fax if you want a copy of the certs. -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:03 PM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA VOC ( which is call POC out there--precursor organic compunds). SOx--yes, if it can be used for PM. -----Original Message----- From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:06 PM To: doppenheimer@natsource.com Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA are you looking for VOC and SOx in the bay area? -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:33 AM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA there's that: it's VOC and not NOx. having a hard time with the columns. . . . -----Original Message----- From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:36 PM To: doppenheimer@natsource.com Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA there is that? -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:30 AM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA oh, right, VOC, there is that. -d -----Original Message----- From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:06 PM To: doppenheimer@natsource.com Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA that's voc and we sold it. the 179 is no longer ours, according to the tnrcc and our records. -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:45 AM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA also cert. 1494 for 5.94 tpy that you picked up from Rhodia.....? -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:35 AM To: 'Trevor.Woods@enron.com' Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA ok, it's a 98.2 tpy balance. and as far as I can tell, it's in certificate number 1427. What was the last deal you did for those--81 tpy to Air Liquide on 11/14/00? Reducing the ~179 to 98. keep me posted. --D. -----Original Message----- From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:02 PM To: doppenheimer@natsource.com Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA according to our records and the tnrcc we don't have any. if you know better and can find the cert numbers we'll sell them. -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:56 PM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: 179 ERC balance in HGA any progress on those leftover NOx offsets in Houston? -----Original Message----- From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:28 PM To: doppenheimer@natsource.com Subject: RE: how about PM in the Bay? any word on the nox in san joaquin? -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:27 PM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: RE: how about PM in the Bay? supposed to be major, all good, etc. no limits i know. will accept a due diligence period after close -----Original Message----- From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: doppenheimer@natsource.com Subject: RE: how about PM in the Bay? what's the source of the ys credits? can it be used for a major source, any limitations, etc? -----Original Message----- From: David Oppenheimer @ENRON Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:30 PM To: Woods, Trevor Subject: how about PM in the Bay? seller of a couple hundred. closing some pieces around 50K. sounds like he would hit the next bid a fair bit below. ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************