Subject: Re: Cinergy vs COMED phy spread
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT)

Chris
 
The changes, except for the scheduling changes, have been included in the 
proposed final version of this East Power Physical Spread product and as 
requested confirm that I currently have no further issues with this product. 

The quicker we can get the scheduling language added the better, especially 
from the trader's perspective.
 
Regards,
 
Marcus

	Marcus Nettelton
	05/25/2001 11:28 AM
		
		 To: Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Fletcher J Sturm/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin Meredith/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Re: Cinergy vs COMED phy spread

Chris
 
Suggested additions are marked in red. I have included the scheduling 
language agreed for the Into products as well.
 
Regards,
 
Marcus

	Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/25/2001 09:38 AM
		 
		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fletcher J Sturm/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Kevin Meredith/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Cinergy vs COMED phy spread

Marcus-

 Please review the attached long description for a new East Power phy spread 
product/product type and let me know of any changes or  suggestions.

Fletch-

 Please review the description as well and contact me with any questions you 
may have about the new functionality.

Chris Walker
3-7533