Subject: Re: Choice of Law clause
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 04:31:00 -0800 (PST)

Per my voice mail,  attached is an alternative to the language originally
proposed re:  statutory reference in the ISDA choice of law clause.  David
Mitchell and I discussed the issue and believe that the statutory reference
is fine. We note that the statutory threshold --  contracts "arising out of
a transaction covering in the aggregate not less than $250,000"  -- will
likely be met either with each confirm individually or with all confirms in
the aggregate .

Please do not hesitate to contact David at (212) 504-6285 or me at (212)
504-6261 to discuss this further.

(See attached file: Governing Law 2.doc)

Joan A. Stumpf
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, New York  10038
Tel:  (212) 504-6261
Fax:   (212) 504-6666

                    David
                    Mitchell             To:     Joan Stumpf/NY/CWT@CWT
                                         cc:
                    12/13/2000           Subject:
                    02:57 PM

per our t/c
---------------------- Forwarded by David Mitchell/NY/CWT on 12/13/2000
02:59 PM ---------------------------

[email-masked]@enron.com on 12/12/2000 06:50:11 PM

To:   [email-masked]
cc:   [email-masked]
Subject:

(See attached file: Governing Law.doc)As we discussed, enclosed is the
standard choice of law provision of our ISDA schedule, red-lined to show
how the statutory reference might be worded.  Mark Taylor and I are
interested in your thoughts on the matter. -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
[email-masked]
(See attached file: Governing Law.doc)

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally 
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or 
disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are 
believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, 
it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and 
no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

 - Governing Law 2.doc
 - Governing Law.doc