Subject: Re: ads approval
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 06:14:00 -0700 (PDT)

That works for me.

	Kal Shah
	08/11/2000 01:03 PM
		
		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: ads approval

How about if we get permission from the newspapers that they are ok with 
running these ads in their newspaper?  Would that be sufficient back up to 
protect us?

Kal

From: Mark Taylor on 08/11/2000 12:27 PM
To: Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron 
Subject: Re: ads approval  

My only concern is the 8 hours out of date reference.  As of when?  It might 
not be 8 hours old when they go to press so do we mean when it is being 
read?  Would it hurt to say something to the effect of "By the time you read 
this" as a lead in?  Are we sure that even this is accurate?  How long from 
press run til the first copy hits the street? 

	Kal Shah
	08/07/2000 06:50 PM
		 
		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer
		 cc: 
		 Subject: ads approval

Please provide approval of the following ads for Global editions of the Wall 
Street Journal and Financial Times.  We are going to remove mention of 
EnronOnline being the only website in the world to reach $100 billion in 
eight months from the ad text.  The rest of the ad copy will stay as is.  We 
plan to run sometime beginning in September.

Thanks