Subject: Re: Quick Question RE: COMEX bid/offers for Reuters
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 04:31:00 -0700 (PDT)

That's probably OK - just a little further into the gray.  The main concern 
is that we not be "marketing" the product with reference to the exchange - in 
our view using the exchange in the name of the product would be a problem but 
references to the exchange may be acceptable in the product description - an 
example of what would not work would be describing the product as a "COMEX 
lookalike" or something similar.  

	Paul Goddard@ENRON
	04/19/2001 09:08 AM
		
		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dave Samuels/hou/ect@ECT, Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin 
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Quick Question RE: COMEX bid/offers for Reuters

Thanks Mark - my understanding however is that the long description with the 
reference to COMEX will be viewable by Reuters users so does this change your 
view or would we still be okay, given that the reference to COMEX is quite 
benign (i.e. we have similar references in our long descriptions for IPE, 
Platts etc.)?