Message-ID: <15121057.1075860059836.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: david.forster@enron.com
Subject: Re: Gas Option language
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor
X-To: David Forster
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor _Dec_2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

The language works for me as long as the long description describes 
multi-month options as a series of multiple options.




David Forster
09/23/99 04:24 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Gas Option language  

Mark,

the only physical option in the U.S. at the moment is emissions. Are you 
happy to amend the emissions language in a manner similar to what Justin and 
Edmund proposed for UK gas physical options?

Dave




To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Gas Option language

Here's my revised version - let me know what you think.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on 
09/22/99 04:54 PM ---------------------------


Taffy Milligan
09/22/99 04:53 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Gas Option language  

Mark,  

Attached, per your request, is Revised Gas Option Language