Message-ID: <18861817.1075860066674.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 01:30:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: dale.neuner@enron.com
Subject: Re: New Pulp Products
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mark Taylor
X-To: Dale Neuner
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor _Dec_2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

Just a couple of comments and questions:

Is it appropriate to refer to these as "US" transactions since the prices are 
clearly from outside the US?  I recognize that ENA is the counterparty but I 
think this may be confusing to our customers.

The term Business Day should be capitalized (it's defined in the GTC) [but 
it's defined with reference to NY & Houston banks being open - does that work 
for pulp transactions?].

I'm not thrilled with the language for the last ten days of the contract 
period on the Pulpex description - is that what we use for current 
confirmations?

In the definition of the Index for the Finnish product, the word "relevent" 
should be deleted.








Dale Neuner on 01/25/2000 03:45:55 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: New Pulp Products

Mark

We have created two new Pulp Products, on based on the PIX, one the Pulpex. 
PLease review and offer comments/approval.