Message-ID: <32401319.1075858604916.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:06:56 -0700 (PDT) From: legal <.taylor@enron.com> To: brent.hendry@enron.com Subject: RE: "short form" financial master Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) X-To: Hendry, Brent X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Mark E (Legal)\Sent Items X-Origin: Taylor-M X-FileName: MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged).pst Let's get together with Sara and Mary to discuss how we should move forward with the forms. -----Original Message----- From: Hendry, Brent Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:04 AM To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) Subject: FW: "short form" financial master Mark, Do we want to propose they use the Industrial (which is the document I believe they were previously given) or do we want to ISDA'ize it for them to review? Brent -----Original Message----- From: Smith, Mike Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:34 AM To: Hendry, Brent Subject: "short form" financial master Brent--there is a lot of talk down here about wanting to use a "short from" financial master for recurring trades with retail counterparties. There have been a couple of drafts floating around in connection with the now defunct Fast Track initiative. Is there a standard form of a short form financial master that has already been fully reviewed by the company and that would be ready and proper for EES to use? Thanks. MDS