Message-ID: <6329227.1075852536772.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:03:55 -0800 (PST)
From: c..james@enron.com
To: m..tholt@enron.com, matt.smith@enron.com
Subject: Socal Imbalance Trades
Cc: sherry.anastas@enron.com, patti.sullivan@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: sherry.anastas@enron.com, patti.sullivan@enron.com
X-From: James, Marlo C. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MJAMES>
X-To: Tholt, Jane M. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jtholt>, Smith, Matt </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Msmith18>
X-cc: Anastas, Sherry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sanasta>, Sullivan, Patti </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Psulliv>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JTHOLT (Non-Privileged)\Tholt, Jane M.\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Tholt-J
X-FileName: JTHOLT (Non-Privileged).pst

Here is an update for the Imbalance Trades for SoCal.  As of right now March and August 2000 and July 2001 do not tie with what SoCal shows we traded.  I have attached my spreadsheet showing the comparison for Socal and Unify and what the Trader spreadsheet shows. 

Thanks,
Marlo James
Ext. 3-4707