Message-ID: <6374394.1075855049683.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 06:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: d..thomas@enron.com
To: david.ingram@enron.com
Subject: A question about East power portal information
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Thomas, Paul D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PTHOMAS2>
X-To: Ingram, David </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dingram>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \PTHOMAS2 (Non-Privileged)\Thomas, Paul D.\Sent Items
X-Origin: Thomas-P
X-FileName: PTHOMAS2 (Non-Privileged).pst

Jiewen and Mark,

I am sure I do not understand the basis for the information but two reports seem to contradict.  

The PJM 180 day forecast predicts 4000MW offline today.
<http://eastpower.dev.corp.enron.com/portal/basic_page.aspx?mod=8&title=PJM%20Generation%20Outages&url=/Cooper/PJMOutage.asp>

The PJM outage report predicts 1908 MW offline.  
<http://eastpower.dev.corp.enron.com/portal/basic_page.aspx?mod=8&url=http://eastpower.dev.corp.enron.com/scripts/outage.dll?REGION=MAAC>

Do we have a feel for which of these is more reliable?    
Li, Jiewen; Symms, Mark
Thanks,
David Ingram