Message-ID: <29586581.1075857803579.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 03:10:00 -0800 (PST)
From: judy.townsend@enron.com
To: chris.germany@enron.com
Subject: Dominion 637
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Judy Townsend
X-To: Chris Germany
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Judith_Townsend_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Townsend-J
X-FileName: jtownse.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 11:04 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           12/06/2000 03:42 PM
	

To: John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor 
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON 
Subject: Dominion 637

FYI.   (DTI is obviously what they are calling Dominion these days.)

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 
03:39 PM ---------------------------


"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com> on 12/06/2000 08:19:48 AM
To: <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: DTI 637


We have learned the following from a talkative DTI rep:

DTI intends to  modify its existing 637 proposals.  Apparently, in light of 
customer opposition, DTI intends to withdraw its proposal to shorten the 
imbalance make-up period from 20 days to 72 hours and will instead develop a 
new rate schedule for electric generators, who it claims are the entities 
that drove DTI's need to shorten the make-up period in the first instance.